本期双语案例推送孙银山诉南京欧尚超市有限公司江宁店买卖合同纠纷案等有关买卖合同纠纷类案例。 目录 Contents 1.孙银山诉南京欧尚超市有限公司江宁店买卖合同纠纷案 Sun Yinshan v. Jiangning Store of Nanjing Auchan Supermarket Co., Ltd. (sales contract dispute) 2.张莉诉北京合力华通汽车服务有限公司买卖合同纠纷案 Zhang Li v. Beijing Heli Huatong Auto Service Co., Ltd. (sales contract dispute) 3. 张俭华、徐海英诉启东市取生置业有限公司房屋买卖合同纠纷案 Zhang Jianhua and Xu Haiying v. Qidong Qusheng Real Estate Co., Ltd. (dispute over housing sales contract)
一、孙银山诉南京欧尚超市有限公司江宁店买卖合同纠纷案
Sun Yinshan v. Jiangning Store of Nanjing Auchan Supermarket Co., Ltd. (sales contract dispute)
【裁判要旨】
消费者购买到不符合食品安全标准的食品，要求销售者或者生产者依照食品安全法规定支付价款十倍赔偿金或者依照法律规定的其他赔偿标准赔偿的，不论其购买时是否明知食品不符合安全标准，人民法院都应予支持。
[Judgment Abstract]
Where a consumer who has purchased food not up to the food safety standards claims that the seller or producer should compensate the consumerin the amount of ten times the money paid under the Food Safety Law or compensate the consumer according to other statutory compensation standards,the people's court should support such a claim whether the consumer knew that the food was not up to the safety standards at the time of purchase.
【法宝引证码】CLI.C.2125099
[CLI Code] CLI.C.2125099 (EN)
二、张莉诉北京合力华通汽车服务有限公司买卖合同纠纷案
Zhang Li v. Beijing Heli Huatong Auto Service Co., Ltd. (sales contract dispute)
【裁判摘要】
1.为家庭生活消费需要购买汽车，发生欺诈纠纷的，可以按照《中华人民共和国消费者权益保护法》处理。
2.汽车销售者承诺向消费者出售没有使用或维修过的新车，消费者购买后发现系使用或维修过的汽车，销售者不能证明已履行告知义务且得到消费者认可的，构成销售欺诈，消费者要求销售者按照消费者权益保护法赔偿损失的，人民法院应予支持。
[Judgment Abstract]
1.A fraud dispute arising from the purchase of an automobile in household consumption may be settled in accordance with the Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of the Rights and Interests of Consumers.
2. Where an automobile seller promises the sale of a new automobile that has never been used or repaired to a consumer, and the consumer finds after the purchase that the automobile is a used or a repaired one, if the seller cannot prove that it has fulfilled the obligation of notifying the consumer of the fact and the consumer has recognized the fact, the seller commits a sales fraud. If the consumer claims damages against the seller in accordance with the Law on the Protection of the Rights and Interests of Consumers, the people's court should support such a claim.
【法宝引证码】CLI.C.1792567
[CLI Code] CLI.C.1792567 (EN)
三、张俭华、徐海英诉启东市取生置业有限公司房屋买卖合同纠纷案
Zhang Jianhua and Xu Haiying v. Qidong Qusheng Real Estate Co., Ltd. (dispute over housing sales contract)
【裁判要旨】
当事人将特定主观目的作为合同条件或成交基础并明确约定，则该特定主观目的之客观化，属于《中华人民共和国合同法》第九十四条第一款第四项的规制范围。如开发商交付的房屋与购房合同约定的方位布局相反，且无法调换，购房者可以合同目的不能实现解除合同。
[Judgment Abstract]
Where a party takes his specific subjective purpose as the contract condition or the basis for deal and makes specific agreements, the objectification of the specific subjective purpose falls within the circumstances prescribed by item 4, paragraph 1, Article 94 of the Contract Law of the People's Republic of China.If the position and the layout of the house delivered by the property developer is opposite to those specified in the housing purchase contract and the house could not be replaced, the house purchaser may terminate the contract on the ground that the purpose of the contract could not be fulfilled.
【法宝引证码】CLI.C.9818157
[CLI Code] CLI.C.9818157 (EN)
更多详情请关注我们的海外社交平台，有更多的双语资讯内容等着您！（PS：Facebook和Twitter需要外网访问权限）
北京北大英华
科技有限公司
PKULaw
Chinalawinfo
PKULaw
Chinalawinfo
PKULaw
Chinalawinfo
-END-
责任编辑 | 吴晓婧
稿件来源 | 北大法宝英文编辑组（Mani）
审核人员 | 张文硕
特别声明：以上内容(如有图片或视频亦包括在内)为自媒体平台“网易号”用户上传并发布，本平台仅提供信息存储服务。
Notice: The content above (including the pictures and videos if any) is uploaded and posted by a user of NetEase Hao, which is a social media platform and only provides information storage services.
